The use and perception of reclaimed group labels for lesbian women and gay men

StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Klysing, Amanda
Braun, Maike
Buscicchio, Giulia
Jacobs, Catho
Formanowicz, Magdalena
Fasoli, Fabio
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2024
Publisher
Journal title
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
Issue
3
Volume
43
Pages
Pages
326-352
ISSN
0261-927X
ISSN of series
Access date
2024-02-25
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
This research tests whether self-labelling with a derogatory or reclaimed label is perceived as an act of reclamation. A pilot study (Nā€‰=ā€‰102) identified English terms used to label lesbian women and gay men. The main study (Nā€‰=ā€‰276) used a between-groups vignette design in which participants read about a woman/man self-labelling with a descriptive (lesbian/gay), reclaimed (queer), or derogatory group (dyke/fag) label. We assessed perceptions of the speaker (control/influence, agency, and efficacy) and group power, label offensiveness, and the likelihood of using the label in the future. Descriptive labels were perceived as less offensive and more likely to be used compared to reclaimed and derogatory labels. For gay men, using a derogatory label compared to other labels decreased perceived agency, but did not influence control/influence and efficacy. For lesbian women, there were no differences in perceptions of power depending on the label used.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
reclamation
derogatory group labels
sexual minorities
self-labelling
reappropriation
lesbian
gay
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
cc-by
Except as otherwise noted, this item is licensed under the Attribution licence | Permitted use of copyrighted works
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Views
Views19
Acquisition Date26.12.2024
Downloads
Downloads16
Acquisition Date26.12.2024
AltmetricsĀ©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Google Scholar