Advanced search

Recent Additions
  • 2026
    cc-by-nc-sa

    Narcissistic admiration and rivalry, Machiavellianism and willingness to engage in unethical pro-organisational behaviour (UPB)

    BACKGROUND This survey of Polish employees replicates research on the relationship between narcissism, Machiavellianism and unethical pro-organisational behaviour (UPB) that was previously conducted in other countries such as China, Pakistan and the US. Positive associations between narcissism, Machiavellianism and UPB were expected to occur. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE The survey covered 250 people working in large corporations across Poland. The sample included 163 women (65%) and 87 men (35%). Narcissism was measured with the NARQ questionnaire, developed as an operationalisation of the narcissistic admiration and rivalry concept (NARC). The MACH-4 scale was used to measure Machiavellianism. Readiness for UPB, on the other hand, was measured using the Polish version of the UPB Scale. RESULTS The research showed statistically significant positive relationships between narcissistic admiration, rivalry and Machiavellianism and the readiness to engage in UPB. At the same time, narcissistic rivalry and its components aggressiveness and striving for supremacy, and Machiavellianism correlate most strongly with UPB. Regression and mediation analyses showed that the significant variables to predict higher levels of readiness to engage in UPB are rivalry (aggressiveness) and Machiavellianism. Machiavellianism, moreover, appears as a mediator in the positive relationship of rivalry and its components (devaluation of others, striving for supremacy) with UPB. CONCLUSIONS Significant predictors of UPB are narcissistic rivalry, including aggressiveness, and Machiavellianism. A Machiavellian strategy may enable UPB to be undertaken by those with a tendency to dominate and devalue others.
    Otwarty dostępArtykułyJournal article
  • cc-by-nc

    From Insecurity to Exchange: Attachment Anxiety and Avoidance Predict Exchange Orientation via Different Psychological Mechanisms.

    Across three studies (N = 2,309), we examined the relationship between attachment insecurity and aspects of exchange orientation. Study 1 showed that attachment anxiety was related to exchange orientation toward romantic partners and acquaintances, and calculative mindset, whereas attachment avoidance was related to exchange orientation toward romantic partners and a calculative mindset. Preregistered Study 2 replicated these links longitudinally. Preregistered Study 3 revealed distinct mechanisms: need for cognitive closure mediated the link between anxiety and exchange orientation, while desire for control mediated the link between avoidance and exchange orientation. Together, we show that exchange orientation functions as a compensatory mechanism, providing predictability and alleviating uncertainty for individuals with high attachment anxiety and preserving autonomy for individuals with high attachment avoidance.
    Otwarty dostępArtykułyJournal article
  • Public survey dataset for the project: Prudent antibiotic use and strategies to prevent antimicrobial resistance

    This dataset (‘Public survey dataset/zbiór danych”) contains anonymous responses from participants in a public opinion survey about antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The first row of the data file contains the labels for the questions.The remaining rows in the data file correspond to individual respondent answers. The columns contain their responses to the respective survey questions, as well as demographic data. The full survey questionnaire is also provided in both Polish and English. The questions in the questionnaire are identical to the thematic questions in the dataset, but the dataset also includes additional demographic variables.
    Dane badawczeOtwarte dane badawcze
  • 2026-01
    cc-by

    Wherefore art thou competitors? How situational affordances help differentiate among prosociality, individualism, and competition

    Liu, Yi
    Stivers, Adam W.
    Murphy, Ryan O.
    Van Doesum, Niels J.
    Joireman, Jeff
    Gallucci, Marcello
    Aharonov-Majar, Efrat
    Athenstaedt, Ursula
    Bai, Liying
    Bohm, Robert
    Buchan, Nancy R.
    Chen, Xiao-Ping
    Dumont, Kitty B.
    Engelmann, Jan B.
    Eriksson, Kimmo
    Euh, Hyun
    Fiedler, Susann
    Friesen, Justin
    Gachter, Simon
    Garcia, Camilo
    Gonzalez, Roberto
    Graf, Sylvie
    Hrebickova, Martina
    Karagonlar, Gokhan
    Kiyonari, Toko
    Kou, Yu
    Kuhlman, D. Michael
    Lay, Siugmin
    Leonardelli, Geoffrey J.
    Li, Norman P.
    Li, Yang
    Maciejowsky, Boris
    Manesi, Zoi
    Mashuri, Ali
    Mok, Aurelia
    Moser, Karin S.
    Netedu, Adrian
    Pammi, Chandrasekhar
    Platow, Michael J.
    Reinders Folmer, Christopher P.
    Reyna, Cecilia
    Simao, Claudia
    Utz, Sonja
    van der Mejn, Leander
    Waldzus, Sven
    Wang, Yiwen
    Weber,Bernd
    Weisel, Ori
    Wildschut, Tim
    Winter, Fabian
    Wu, Junhui
    Yong, Jose C.
    Van Lange, Paul A. M.
    The Triple Dominance Measure (choosing between prosocial, individualistic, and competitive options) and the Slider Measure (“sliding” between various orientations, for example, from individualistic to prosocial) are two widely used techniques to measure social value orientation, that is, the weight individuals assign to own and others’ outcomes in interdependent situations. Surprisingly, there is only moderate correspondence between these measures, but it is unclear why and what the implications are for identifying individual differences in social value orientation. Using a dataset of 8021 participants from 31 countries and regions, this study revealed that the Slider Measure identi ed fewer competitors than the Triple Dominance Measure, accounting for pproximately one-third of the non-correspondence between the two measures. This is (partially) because many of the Slider items do not afford a competitive option. In items where competition is combined with individualism, competitors tended to make the same choices as individualists. Futhermore, we demonstrated the uniqueness of competitors. Compared to prosocials and individualists, competitors exhibited lower levels of both social mindfulness and trust. Overall, the present work highlights the importance of situational affordances in measuring personality, the bene ts of distinguishing between individualists and competitors, and the importance of utilizing a measure that distinguishes between these two proself orientations.
    Otwarty dostępArtykułyJournal article
  • 2026-01-22
    other

    Discrepancy between self-report and neurophysiological markers of socio-affective responses in lonely individuals

    Theoretical models suggest that loneliness may be linked to abnormal social information processing and reduced emotion regulation capacity; yet these effects have mostly been investigated using self-report methods. Therefore, the current preregistered study examined whether loneliness is associated with objective and subjective markers of bottom-up emotional reactivity and cognitive reappraisal efficiency in a cohort of 150 young adults (18–35 years old) recruited to reflect the distribution of loneliness scores in the Polish population. Participants completed an emotion processing and regulation task with both social and nonsocial stimuli while their electroencephalography activity was recorded. Contrary to the hypotheses, when faced with socio-affective stimuli, lonelier individuals did not exhibit abnormal markers of early sensory processing, late sustained processing, or decreased efficiency in reappraisal use, as indicated by event-related potential markers. Only a weak association between loneliness and an increased P300 response to negative vs. neutral social stimuli was found. This pattern of findings did not align with subjective arousal reports, which suggested a decreased response to negative social stimuli and reduced cognitive reappraisal efficiency in lonelier participants. These results suggest that loneliness is linked to disruptions in emotional self-awareness rather than an abnormal response to socio-affective stimuli.
    Otwarty dostępArtykułyJournal article
Most viewed