Recent Submissions

2026-04-01
embargo

Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences

Miske, Olivia
Abatayo, Anna Lou
Daley, Mason
Dirzo, Mirka
Fox, Nicholas
Haber, Noah
Hahn, Krystal M.
Struhl, Melissa Kline
Mawhinney, Brinna
Silverstein, Priya
Stankov, Theresa
Tyner, Andrew H.
Adamkovič, Matúš
Alzahawi, Shilaan
Anafinova, Saule
Awtrey, Eli
Axxe, Erick
Bailey, James
Bakker, Bert N.
Balaji, Akshaya
Banik, Gabriel
Bartoš, František
Berkman, Henk
Berry, Zachariah
Bethke, Felix S.
Brady, Timothy F.
Breznau, Nate
Capitan, Sara
Capitán, Tabaré
Caquelin, Laura
Cheng, Kent Jason
Chopik, William J.
Clochard, Gwen-Jiro
Coupé, Tom
Cummins, Jamie
Burak, Elif Gizem Demirag
Duan, Jianhua
Esterling, Kevin M.
Evans, Thomas R.
Fiala, Nathan
Field, James
Gay, Victor
Geng, Jing
Gereke, Johanna
Gleibs, Ilka Helene
Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie
Grigoryev, Dmitry
Gunby, Nicholas
Hanel, Paul H. P.
Hong, Sanghyun
Houlihan, Sean Dae
Huntington-Klein, Nick
Jankowsky, Kristin
Jonas, Kai
Kačmár, Pavol
Kapoor, Hansika
Karcher, Sebastian
Kołczyńska, Marta
Kretschmer, David
Lazarevic, Ljiljana
Leahy, Katelin E.
Lee, Jessica C.
Limnios, Christopher
Liu, An-Chiao
Lloyd, John Wills
Lopez-Nicolas, Ruben
Lou, Nigel Mantou
Lucas, Richard E.
Maier, Maximilian
Mallinson, Daniel J.
Martončik, Marcel
McCall, Michael C.
Mehta, Nikita
Méndez, Esteban
Michalak, Johannes
Molden, Daniel C.
Mushtaq, Faisal
Neuendorf, Claudia
Nichols, Austin Lee
Nilsonne, Gustav
O’Boyle, Ernest
Oh, Jeewon
Ostermann, Thomas
Oyebanjo, Abiola
Panczak, Radoslaw
Pavlov, Yuri
Pavlović, Zoran
Peter, Noemi
Peters, Kim
Porter, Nathaniel
Purol, Mariah
Puthillam, Arathy
Ramljak, Marco
Reader, Arran
Reed, W. Robert
Röer, Jan Philipp
Ropovik, Ivan
Savi, Alexander
Schmidt, Kathleen
Schnabel, Landon
Sevigny, Eric
Shaki, Samuel
Shakya, Shishir
Soh, Andrew
Somo, Angela
Sonmez, Fatih
Strømland, Eirik
Suchow, Jordan
Szabelska, Anna
Tagat, Anirudh
Tutor, Melba Verra
Urbanska, Karolina
Dessel, Pieter Van
Vargo, Elisabeth Julie
Vo, Diem Thi Hong
Volkman, Victor
Wang, Ke
Wichman, Aaron L.
Williams, Jamal R.
Winter, Fabian
Wintermantel, Ferdinand
Zhang, Nan
Ziano, Ignazio
Zogmaister, Cristina
Zupan, Zorana
Nosek, Brian A.
Errington, Timothy M.
Published claims should be reproducible, yielding the same result when the same analysis is applied to the same data. Here we assess reproducibility in a stratified random sample of 600 papers published from 2009 to 2018 in 62 journals spanning the social and behavioural sciences. The authors of 144 (24.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 20.8–27.6%) papers made data available to assess reproducibility and, for 38 others, we obtained source data to reconstruct the dataset. We assessed 143 out of the 182 available datasets and found that 76.6 (53.6%, 95% CI = 45.8–60.7%) papers were rated as precisely reproducible and 105.0 (73.5%, 95% CI = 66.4–80.0%) were rated as at least approximately reproducible (within 15% of the original effects or within 0.05 of original P values) after inverse weighting each of the 551 claims by the number of claims per paper. We observed higher reproducibility for papers from political science and economics compared with other fields, for more recent papers compared with older papers and for papers from journals that require data sharing. Implementation of measures to verify that research is reproducible is needed to support trustworthiness in the complex enterprise of knowledge production.
Otwarty dostępArtykułyJournal article
2026
closedaccess

Prawo spadkowe, rodzinne i opiekuńcze. Kazusy

Publikacja zawiera zbiór kazusów z rozwiązaniami z zakresu prawa spadkowego oraz prawa rodzinnego i opiekuńczego. Każdy kazus został starannie opracowany według jednolitego i logicznego schematu, obejmującego stan faktyczny, pytania problemowe, wskazanie podstawy prawnej oraz rozwiązanie. Zróżnicowany stopień trudności pozwala stopniowo rozwijać umiejętności analizy, argumentacji i prawidłowej kwali­fikacji prawnej zdarzeń. Opracowanie nie ogranicza się jedynie do zagadnień z zakresu prawa materialnego, ponieważ kazusy obejmują też elementy prawa procesowego. W pierwszym rozdziale omówiono kluczowe zagadnienia prawa spadkowego, takie jak: dziedziczenie ustawowe, testamentowe, niegodność dziedziczenia, zrzeczenie się dziedziczenia, zachowek, zapis windykacyjny, polecenie, stwierdzenie nabycia spadku, akt poświadczenia dziedziczenia i dział spadku. Drugi rozdział skupia się na problematyce prawa rodzinnego i opiekuńczego – m.in. mał­żeństwie, domniemaniu ojcostwa, rozwodzie, separacji, władzy rodzicielskiej, kon­taktach z dzieckiem, alimentach i przysposobieniu. Książka jest przeznaczona dla studentów studiów prawniczych i aplikantów adwokac­kich, radcowskich i sądowych. Może być ona także pomocna dla dydaktyków prowa­dzących zajęcia z zakresu prawa cywilnego.
Pozostałe osiągnięcia naukoweMonografia (zamknięty dostęp)Monograph
2026-04
cc-by

Hypocrisy moderates self-interest bias in moral character judgments

Self-interest bias describes an observer’s tendency to judge moral transgression leniently when they benefit from it. However, what factors moderate the self-interest bias is an open empirical question. Here, we investigated to what extent hypocrisy moderates the self-interest bias. Preregistered Study 1a (N = 194) and replication in Study 1b (N = 193) demonstrated that observers’ interest impacts moral character judgments of hypocritical transgressors. This effect was explained by observers’ goal attainment due to transgression (Study 2, N = 713) and agreement to aid observers’ or ingroup interests (Study 3, N = 634). Importantly, transgressors’ hypocrisy moderated the impact of observers’ interests in moral character judgments (Studies 2 & 3). In summary, when judging hypocritical transgressors, peoples’ moral character judgments tend to be biased by their or their group’s interests. However, in comparison to non-hypocritical transgressors, this impact is less pronounced.
Otwarty dostępArtykułyJournal article
2026-04-14
closedaccess

Modification of media’s visual identity as a response to the war in Ukraine. An exploratory study

Jupowicz-Ginalska, Anna
Harms, Bianca
Samelova, Anna
Maijanen, Palvi
Anton, Anca
Will, Andreas
Zakrzewska, Emilia
Matei, Antonia
Anghel, Gheorghe
Ilie, Cornelia
We examine how European media responded to the Russian invasion of Ukraine through visual identity changes. Using visual discourse and communication theories, we analysed 76 logo modifications in six countries: Finland, Germany, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and the Netherlands. A cross-national comparison revealed significant differences in the scale, type, and duration of changes. Media in former Eastern Bloc countries showed the strongest visual solidarity, while Northern and Western European media used more restrained strategies, reflecting different historical contexts. Modifications included Ukrainian colours, solidarity slogans, and design adjustments. Though mostly temporary, these symbolic actions turned branding into civic engagement and reinforced shared values. This study contributes to media research by framing logo changes as visual discourse and symbolic communication in times of conflict.
Pozostałe osiągnięcia naukoweMonografia (zamknięty dostęp)Monograph Chapter
2026-04-20
cc-by

Beyond WEIRD societies: Global social identifications across 45 countries and their socio-­ cultural and economic predictors

Hamer, Katarzyna
Penczek, Marta
Marcinkowska, Karolina
Nowak, Bartek
Branowska, Katarzyna
Sparkman, David
Loy, Laura S.
Okvitawanli, Ayu
Gkinopoulos, Theofilos
Hackett, Justin D.
Bertin, Paul
Carmona, Margarida
Guerra, Rita
Wlodarczyk, Anna
Akello, Grace
Albarello, Flavia
Ashraf, Mujeeba
Bednarowicz, Maja
Beixiang, Liang
Benningstad, Nora
Bierwiaczonek, Kinga
Bornman, Elirea
Bosak, Janine
Darkwah, Ernest
Delouvée, Sylvain
Eder, Stephanie J.
Enea, Violeta
Espinosa, Augustin
Etchezahar, Edgardo
Feriis, Laura J.
Gudzovskaya, Alla A.
Guerch, Keltouma
Hofhuis, Joep
Hornsey, Matthew J.
Igbokwe, David
Ibarra, Manuel L.
Kamble, Shanmukh V.
Kaniasty, Krzysztof
Kengyel, Gabriella J.
Khanipour, Hamid
Labor, Paul
Lima, Aline Venceslau Vieira
Loshenko, Oleksandra
Mintz, Keren K.
Monzani, Lucas
Moriizumi, Satoshi
Moynihan, Andrew B.
Mubarique, Mohammed
Nagy, Radó P.
Nera, Kenzo
Nyul, Boglárka
Osinde, James
Özsoy, Emrah
Palacio, Jorge
Pešout, Ondrey
Pirttilä‐Backman, Anna-Maija
Pong, Vivien
Rentería, Erico
Restrepo, Dayana
Samekin, Adil
Segal‐Klein, Hilah
Selim, Heyla A.
Sindic, Denis
Spence, Alexa
Stöckli, Sabrina
Tam, Kim‐Pong
Ungaretti, Joaquín
Wang, Angela
Yahiiaiev, Illia
Yemelyanova, Yelena
In an increasingly globalized world challenged by multiple social problems, global social identifications (GSIs, e.g., with all humanity) are concepts of growing interest. Although such identifications can be affected by the cultural contexts in which they are manifested, research on them remains largely confined to Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Using data collected in 45 countries (N = 9807, preregistered), we compared the strength of three types of GSIs between countries and cultural clusters, and explored the possible role of five cultural dimensions. The results revealed relatively small cross-national differences in GSIs overall, but African and South-East Asian cultural clusters reported significantly stronger identifications than those from other regions, with India, South Africa, and Ghana scoring the highest. Contrary to our hypotheses, GSIs were positively associated with in-group collectivism, survival values, and traditional values, while institutional collectivism was unrelated. As expected, humane orientation was positively related to most GSIs. Additional exploratory analyses showed higher GSIs in countries with a lower quality of life (broadly understood). GSIs were also more pronounced in less globalized, younger societies, with a higher proportion of men, fewer immigrants, and stronger diversity. Our study highlights the need to broaden research on GSIs beyond WEIRD contexts.
Otwarty dostępArtykułyJournal article