Termin, umowny termin zawity i wygaśnięcie roszczenia - uwagi porządkujące. Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego - Izba Cywilna z dnia 17 marca 2022 r., II CSKP 217/22

StatusVoR
Dublin Core metadata
Alternative title
Term, Contractual PrescripƟon Term and Expiry of Claims – SystemaƟzing Remarks. Commentary on the Decision of the Supreme Court – Civil Chamber of 17 March 2022, II CSKP 217/22
Authors
Szlęzak, Andrzej
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2022-12-01
Publisher
Journal title
Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich
Issue
12
Volume
Pages
Pages
33-51
DOI
ISSN
0867-1850
ISSN of series
Weblink
https://sip.lex.pl/komentarze-i-publikacje/czasopisma/termin-umowny-termin-zawity-i-wygasniecie-roszczenia-uwagi-386305262
Access date
2025-07-01
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
In his comments on the decision of the Supreme Court, the author argues that there is no correlation between limitation periods and contractual prescription terms. He also points out that the institution of expiry of claims is not of an extraordinary character; such expiry is the consequence of the parties’ introduction to their legal transaction of a term or condition (in the meaning of Articles 89 et seq. and Articles 110 et seq. of the Civil Code), and has nothing to do with the Civil Code’s regulation of limitation periods.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
prawo cywilne
zobowiązania
klauzula 20.1 wzorca umow- nego FIDIC
umowny termin zawity
termin przedawnienia
Keywords EN
civil law
obligaƟons
clause 20.1 of FIDIC Terms of Contract
contractual prescripƟon term
limitaƟon period
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
URI
https://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/1562
Type
License type
closedaccess
There is no access to this item
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Views
Views4
Acquisition Date30.08.2025
Downloads
Downloads2
Acquisition Date30.08.2025
Google Scholar
Google Scholar