Conclusions. Some suggestions for evaluators' daily work in a post-truth world
Conclusions. Some suggestions for evaluators' daily work in a post-truth world
StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Olejniczak, Karol
Marra, Mita
Paulson, Arne
Monograph
Evaluation in the post-truth world
Monograph (alternative title)
Editor
Marra, Mita
Olejniczak, Karol
Paulson, Arne
Date
2024-04-16
Place of publication
Publisher
Routledge
Journal title
Evaluation in the Post-Truth World
Volume
Pages
192-199
ISSN
ISBN
9781032719979
eISBN
Series
Series number
ISSN of series
Access date
2024-04-16
Remarks
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
The evaluation aims to improve public interventions (policies and programs) and ultimately contribute to social betterment and justice (Chelimsky, 2006; Henry & Mark, 2003). Daily practice typically involves evaluators assisting policy-makers and policy-takers in finding a better match between policy problems and available policy solutions. Previous volumes of The Comparative Policy Evaluation series have comprehensively discussed the challenges associated with the evaluation mission and its practices (see, for instance: Leeuw et al., 1994; Rieper et al., 2012; Palenberg & Paulson, 2020). However, post-truth, which in short denies evidence and facts, provides a new context in which evaluators work, making the evaluation mission even more challenging.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
Keywords other
Conference edition name
Conference place
Start date
Finish date
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Organisational Unit
Instytut Nauk Społecznych
Type
Version
Version of Record
License type
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
item.page.relation.dataset
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Collections
Views
12Acquisition Date31.08.2025
Downloads
20Acquisition Date31.08.2025