Monografie

Permanent URI for this collection

https://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/11

Recent Submissions

Now showing 1 - 5 of 138
  • 2026-05-01
    other

    Immersive VR Training for Tram Drivers. Evaluating Procedural Knowledge Acquisition and User Experience in a Controlled Study

    Anna Warchoł-Jakubowska
    Iga Stasiak
    Krzysztof Krejtz
    Izabela Krejtz
    The present study evaluates an immersive VR training module for safety-critical the Pre-Operation Check (OC) in tram driver training using VR180 expert video with instructor commentary. In a controlled study (n=35), trainees were assigned to VR or paper-based instruction and assessed across two instructional sessions. VRtrained participants achieved higher procedural knowledge and perceived readiness, with comparable stress reduction across groups and excellent usability and user experience ratings. Results indicate that immersive VR can effectively complement traditional instruction for procedural learning in public transport training.
    Otwarty dostępMonografieMonograph Chapter (Conference proceedings)
  • 2026-04-13
    cc-by

    Does Peer Review Need to Change? A Panel on Reporting Standards and Checklists in the Age of AI

    Duchowski, Andrew
    Stefik, Andreas
    Ralph, Paul
    Dix, Alan
    Krejtz, Krzysztof
    Myers, Brad A.
    Jorge, Joaquim
    Wehbe, Rina R.
    Oliver, Nuria
    Shamma, David A.
    Candello, Heloisa
    Cesar, Pablo
    Lopes, Pedro
    Artizzu, Valentino
    Draxler, Fiona
    Lopez, Gustavo
    Reinschluessel, Anke V.
    Tong, Xin
    Toup Dugas, Phoebe O,
    Many scientific fields of study use formally established reportingstandards to foster research and experimental design, transparency,replicability, peer review, and student training. Examples includeCONSORT in medicine, the What Works Clearinghouse in educa-tion, JARS in psychology. Such standards yield agreement on studyreporting and evaluation, even if using different methodologies.CHI has not adopted reporting standards. Like other fields, CHI hasseen an increased number of low-quality submissions and reviewsfueled by AI. This panel’s objective is to discuss advantages and bar-riers of adopting reporting standards for SIGCHI. Panelists includerepresentatives with significant experience creating, adopting andoperationalizing reporting standards in adjacent fields: softwareengineering, CS education, and Programming Languages. The panelwill include an overview of the history of reporting standards, a livedemo of a standards-based peer review system, discussions of op-portunities, challenges, limitations for SIGCHI reporting standards,and an interactive discussion between attendees and panelists
    Otwarty dostępMonografieMonograph Chapter (Conference proceedings)
  • 2026-05-24
    cc-by

    BMC4TimeSec: Verification of Timed Security Protocols

    Zbrzezny, Agnieszka
    Mascardi, Vivian
    Thangarajah, John
    We present BMC4TimeSec, an end-to-end tool for verifying TimedSecurity Protocols (TSP) based on SMT-based bounded model check-ing and multi-agent modelling in the form of Timed InterpretedSystems (TIS) and Timed Interleaved Interpreted Systems (TIIS). In BMC4TimeSec, TSP executions implement the TIS/TIIS envi-ronment (join actions, interleaving, delays, lifetimes), and knowl-edge automata implement the agents (evolution of participantknowledge, including the intruder). The code is publicly available on GitHub, as is a video demon-stration.
    Otwarty dostępMonografieMonograph Chapter (Conference proceedings)
  • 2025-11
    cc-by

    Między polityką a praktyką. Różnorodność społeczna w dokumentach, działaniach i odbiorze mieszkańców

    Martyna Dudziak-Kisio
    Dudek-Mańkowska, Sylwia
    Otwarty dostępMonografieMonograph Chapter (Conference proceedings)
  • 2026-04-17
    cc-by-nc-nd

    Seeking Ways of Understanding Amidst Uncertainty: On the Role of Trust (Not Just in Science) in Discussions on Vaccination

    Izydorczak, Kamil
    Kulesza, Wojciech
    Doliński, Dariusz
    Grzyb, Tomasz
    This chapter explores the complexities of understanding and discussing vaccination amidst uncertainty, emphasizing the role of trust in both scientific and personal contexts. It argues that both advocates and skeptics of vaccination operate within a framework of belief, shaped by subjective interpretations of scientific data rather than direct access to objective facts. The author highlights the psychological barriers individuals face when deciding to vaccinate, including the challenge of prioritizing long-term health benefits over immediate discomfort. Furthermore, the chapter examines the polarization of opinions surrounding vaccination, illustrating how social dynamics and perceived consensus among close contacts influence attitudes. It concludes with strategies for crafting empathetic, consensus-building pro-vaccine messages that acknowledge the concerns of vaccine-hesitant individuals, aiming to foster understanding and reduce polarization.
    Otwarty dostępMonografieMonograph Chapter