“I Cheat” or “We Cheat?” The Structure and Psychological Correlates of Individual vs. Collective Examination Dishonesty

StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Kościelniak, Maciej
Enko, Jolanta
Gąsiorowska, Agata
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2024-02-02
Publisher
Journal title
Journal of Academic Ethics
Issue
1
Volume
22
Pages
Pages
71–87
ISSN
1570-1727
ISSN of series
Weblink
Access date
2024-03-02
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
Examination dishonesty is a global problem that became particularly critical after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and the shift to remote learning. Academic research has often examined this phenomenon as only one aspect of a broader concept of academic dishonesty and as a one-dimensional construct. This article builds on existing knowledge and proposes a novel, two-factor model of examination misconduct, dividing it into individual and collective forms of dishonesty. A study conducted on a large sample of 462 Polish students confirmed the psychometric quality of the new Examination Dishonesty Intention Scale (EDIS) and the superiority of the two-factor model over the unidimensional model. In addition, we tested psychological correlates of both types of academic dishonesty and demonstrated their divergent validity. The results obtained are the subject of a broader discussion in the context of their practical application, and the EDIS questionnaire is proposed as a reliable instrument for exploring intentions of exam dishonesty.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
Academic dishonesty
Examination cheating
Individual cheating
Collective cheating
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
cc-by
Except as otherwise noted, this item is licensed under the Attribution licence | Permitted use of copyrighted works
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Views
Views26
Acquisition Date31.08.2025
Downloads
Downloads98
Acquisition Date31.08.2025
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Google Scholar