When Alexithymia Matters: Distinct Schema–Emotion Processing Profiles of Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry

StatusVoR
Dublin Core metadata
Alternative title
Authors
Scigała, Dawid Konrad
Fabris, Matteo Angelo
Zdankiewicz-Ścigała, Elżbieta
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2026-09-18
Publisher
Journal title
Brain Sciences
Issue
9
Volume
16
Pages
Pages
1-26
DOI
ISSN
2076-3425
ISSN of series
Weblink
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/16/9/990
Access date
2026-09-18
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
Background/Objectives: Alexithymia may constrain emotion regulation, but its relevance may differ across personality configurations. This study examined whether narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry are embedded in distinct early maladaptive schema and alexithymia profiles. Methods: A non-clinical adult sample (N = 311) completed the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire, the Young Schema Questionnaire–Short Form 3, and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale–20. Analyses examined 18 schemas and three alexithymia components—Difficulty Identifying Feelings (DIF), Difficulty Describing Feelings (DDF), and Externally Oriented Thinking (EOT)—using zero-order correlations, within-domain regressions, hierarchical regressions, and structural equation models. Results: Admiration was associated mainly with Approval/Recognition Seeking and Unrelenting Standards and with lower Social Isolation/Alienation, Defectiveness/Shame, Failure, Subjugation, Emotional Inhibition, and Insufficient Self-Control. Rivalry showed a threat-related profile involving Defectiveness/Shame, Subjugation, Emotional Inhibition, Negativity/Pessimism, and Insufficient Self-Control. Entitlement/Grandiosity was positively associated with both dimensions and did not reliably differentiate them. Alexithymia was essentially unrelated to Admiration and did not improve its schema model. In contrast, adding DIF, DDF, and EOT increased explained variance in Rivalry by 5.5%, a small-to-moderate increment; DIF and EOT made independent contributions, whereas DDF did not. A parsimonious Rivalry structural model reproduced these associations but showed mixed global fit. Conclusions: These cross-sectional findings indicate a modest, dimension-specific contribution of alexithymic processing to Rivalry rather than a general association with narcissistic self-regulation. The EOT findings require particular caution because of the subscale’s limited reliability. Longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to test the proposed vulnerability–stress process.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
alexithymia
emotion regulation
emotion processing
narcissistic rivalry
narcissistic admiration
early maladaptive schemas
vulnerability–stress model
Keywords other
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG 3. Good Health and Well-being
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
URI
https://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/2539
Type
License type
cc-by
Except as otherwise noted, this item is licensed under the Attribution licence | Permitted use of copyrighted works
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Grant number
Files
When Alexithymia Matters
When Alexithymia Matters(642.63 KB)
Download
Views
Views0
Acquisition Date20.10.2022
Downloads
Downloads0
Acquisition Date20.10.2022
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Google Scholar