The value of leaders we trust and leaders who make us stronger: Exploring the distinct contributions of different components of identity leadership to group member outcomes
The value of leaders we trust and leaders who make us stronger: Exploring the distinct contributions of different components of identity leadership to group member outcomes
StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Bibic, Kira
Frenzel, Svenja B.
Kerschreiter, Rudolf
Wilson-Lemoine, Jeremy
Steffens, Niklas
Haslam, S. Alexander
Monzani, Lucas
Akfirat, Serap Arslan
Ballada, Christine Joy A.
Bazarov, Tahir
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2026-02
Publisher
Journal title
Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
Issue
2
Volume
29
Pages
Pages
302-322
ISSN
1368-4302
ISSN of series
Access date
2026-02
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
This study investigates the critical role of social identity in leadership, specifically examining identity leadership (IL) and the unique contributions of its four subdimensions: identity prototypicality, identity advancement, identity entrepreneurship, and identity impresarioship. To date, research has largely focused on the global construct of identity leadership and shown that in organizational contexts, it is a predictor of a range of outcomes, including group members’ burnout and organizational citizenship. However, the distinct roles of the four subdimensions remain little understood. Extending earlier findings, we address this gap by testing the hypothesis that the four subdimensions are differentially implicated in two key mechanisms that underlie the relationship between IL and group outcomes: (a) trust in the leader and (b) team identification. The present study explores this proposition by using structural equation modeling with latent factors to test a mediation model in 2020–2021 data from the Global Identity Leadership Development project (GILD; N = 7,855). As hypothesized, we found that identity prototypicality and identity advancement predominantly predicted greater trust in the leader, whereas identity entrepreneurship primarily predicted greater team identification. Contrary to our hypothesis, identity impresarioship showed a negative relation with trust. In turn, both trust in the leader and team identification were positively associated with organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), and negatively with burnout. We conclude by reflecting on the implications of these findings for both the theory and practice of leadership.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
dimensions
identity leadership
social identity
team identification
trust
identity leadership
social identity
team identification
trust