Cost Considerations in Participatory Budgeting: An Empirical Comparison of Knapsack and Approval Ballots

StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Szczupska, Oliwia
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2025-10
Publisher
Journal title
Collective and Individual Decisions
Issue
1
Volume
37
Pages
Pages
21-39
ISSN
ISSN of series
Access date
2025-10-29
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
This article examines the role of cost considerations in shaping the selection of participatory budgeting projects through an empirical comparison between knapsack and k-approval ballot types. Using data from the 2018–2021 elections in the city of Warsaw (Poland), we analyzed how these two methods – each with a fundamentally different approach to cost – affect individual decision-making and collective outcomes. We find that knapsack voting, with its predefined budget constraint, encourages economically mindful behavior and leads to the funding of a greater number of lower-cost initiatives. In contrast, k-approval voting, which limits the number of projects rather than their costs, results in the selection of relatively fewer but more expensive initiatives. To validate these findings, we conducted an online voting experiment simulating both methods. The results show a consistent bias toward more affordable projects when cost consideration mechanisms are embedded in either the ballot type (knapsack) or the aggregation rule (cost-proportional algorithm). Our findings highlight the importance of voting method design in the participatory budgeting process, provide an empirical contribution to the understanding of how different rules function in practice, and offer crucial insights for guiding future implementations and development.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
collective decision-making
participatory budgeting
voting behavior
cost-benefit analysis
knapsack voting
approval voting
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
cc-by
Except as otherwise noted, this item is licensed under the Attribution licence | Permitted use of copyrighted works
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Polskie Generalne Studium Wyborcze (PGSW 2023)
Views
Views17
Acquisition Date16.12.2025
Downloads
Downloads1
Acquisition Date16.12.2025
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Google Scholar