Rape myths, jury deliberations, and conversation analysis: Examining conversational practices used to undermine rape complaints within (mock) jury deliberations
Rape myths, jury deliberations, and conversation analysis: Examining conversational practices used to undermine rape complaints within (mock) jury deliberations
StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Richardson, Emma
Jenkins, Laura
Willmott, Dominic
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2025-06-21
Publisher
Journal title
Journal of Criminal Justice
Issue
Volume
99
Pages
Pages
1-11
ISSN
0047-2352
ISSN of series
Access date
2025-06-21
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
Despite decades of research and policy campaigns, low rates of reports, prosecutions and convictions in rape cases persist. Culturally shared prejudicial beliefs, known as ‘rape myths’, are widely reported to undermine the perceived credibility of complainants in jury deliberations. Most evidence of rape myths is abstracted from the interactional practices in which they are built. Adopting a Discursive Psychological approach, we examine how such ‘myths’ are embedded into jurors' accounts during deliberations. Employing conversation analysis we interrogate how ‘rape myths’ are used within 435 minutes of deliberations from a realistic live trial re-enactment. We describe jurors' use of, ‘discrediting contrastive devices’; used to discredit the complainant's testimony by contrasting their behaviour with what a “typical” person would do prior to, during, and following a rape. We explore rape myths not as social-cognitive states, but as interactional devices deployed while describing, arguing, and persuading, and that are to be supported, resisted, and reformulated by jurors. We argue that it is crucial to understand the circulation of ‘rape myths’ as cultural knowledge and logic in use. We offer further insight into the existence and impact of prejudicial rape myths within jury deliberations, contributing to ongoing debate in rape trial jury functionality and reform.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
Rape myths
Jury deliberations
Conversation analysis
Juror decision making
Rape and serious sexual offences [RASSO]
Jury deliberations
Conversation analysis
Juror decision making
Rape and serious sexual offences [RASSO]
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Collections
Views
3Acquisition Date30.08.2025
Downloads
1Acquisition Date30.08.2025
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
