Are legal professionals more knowledgeable about eyewitness testimony factors than the general public? A survey of judges, prosecutors, and laypeople

StatusPost-Print
Alternative title
Authors
Kabzińska, Joanna
Dukała, Karolina
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2025-01-06
Publisher
Journal title
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
Issue
Volume
Pages
Pages
1-24
ISSN
1321-8719
ISSN of series
Access date
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
This study investigates legal professionals’ knowledge of eyewitness testimony factors, including system and estimator factors, compared to laypeople. Previous research has questioned the adequacy of methods assessing legal actors’ understanding. To address this, 313 legal professionals and 400 laypeople completed a 21-item questionnaire embedded in case-specific scenarios using vignette methodology. Legal professionals achieved an accuracy rate of 66%, compared to 60.3% for laypeople. They more accurately identified estimator factors than system factors, with judges and prosecutors performing better than laypeople in both categories. These results reveal significant variations in knowledge of eyewitness testimony and underscore the need for targeted training programs. Enhancing legal professionals’ understanding of eyewitness factors could contribute to fairer and more accurate judicial outcomes.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
estimator testimony factors
eyewitness memory
eyewitness testimony factors
judicial eyewitness knowledge
laypeople eyewitness knowledge
prosecutor’s eyewitness knowledge
system testimony factors
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
closedaccess
There is no access to this item
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Rola psychologii w procesie podejmowania decyzji przez zawodowych uczestników postępowania karnego
Views
Views22
Acquisition Date31.08.2025
Downloads
Downloads7
Acquisition Date31.08.2025
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Google Scholar