Do the rules of europe’s leading institutional arbitration courts and the UNCITRAL arbitration rules need to be revised? Assessment from the Perspective of 2023

StatusVoR
Simple item page
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-04-15T03:14:39Z
dc.abstract.enWhile some issues (e.g. the principles of service, the expedited procedure for resolving cases and the admissibil-ity of securing a claim before initiating proceedings) are regu-lated in a manner that satisfies the requirements of 2023, other issues (e.g. the rules of holding remote hearings or the conse-quences of failing to meet deadlines in arbitration, in particular the deadlines for issuing an award) would require a number of modifications and improvements. This suggests that a pos-tulate should be presented for a broader discussion within the community – both in Poland and abroad – on the shape of the regulations in this area that would be the most comforta-ble for the parties to the proceedings, the arbitral tribunals and the arbitral institutions, while respecting the basic (universal) arbitration rules.
dc.affiliationInstytut Prawa
dc.affiliationWydział Prawa w Warszawie
dc.contributor.authorAsłanowicz, Marcin
dc.date.access2023-06-30
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-29T07:24:53Z
dc.date.available2023-11-29T07:24:53Z
dc.date.created2023-05-22
dc.date.issued2023-06-30
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>While some issues (e.g. the principles of service, the expedited procedure for resolving cases and the admissibility of securing a claim before initiating proceedings) are regulated in a manner that satisfies the requirements of 2023, other issues (e.g. the rules of holding remote hearings or the consequences of failing to meet deadlines in arbitration, in particular the deadlines for issuing an award) would require a numer of modifications and improvements. This suggests that a postulate should be presented for a broader discussion within the community – both in Poland and abroad – on the shape of the regulations in this area that would be the most comfortable for the parties to the proceedings, the arbitral tribunals and the arbitral institutions, while respecting the basic (universal) arbitration rules.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.physical169-188
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume53
dc.identifier.doi10.31743/recl.15823
dc.identifier.eissn2545-384X
dc.identifier.issn2657-5949
dc.identifier.urihttps://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/187
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/recl/article/view/15823
dc.languageen
dc.pbn.affiliationnauki prawne
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.rights.questionYes_rights
dc.share.articleOTHER
dc.subject.encommercial arbitration
dc.subject.enUNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
dc.subject.enarbitration proceedings’ principles
dc.swps.sciencecloudsend
dc.titleDo the rules of europe’s leading institutional arbitration courts and the UNCITRAL arbitration rules need to be revised? Assessment from the Perspective of 2023
dc.title.journalReview of European and Comparative Law
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typeArticle