Do the rules of europe’s leading institutional arbitration courts and the UNCITRAL arbitration rules need to be revised? Assessment from the Perspective of 2023
Do the rules of europe’s leading institutional arbitration courts and the UNCITRAL arbitration rules need to be revised? Assessment from the Perspective of 2023
StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Asłanowicz, Marcin
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2023-06-30
Publisher
Journal title
Review of European and Comparative Law
Issue
2
Volume
53
Pages
Pages
169-188
ISSN
2657-5949
ISSN of series
Access date
2023-06-30
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
While some issues (e.g. the principles of service, the expedited procedure for resolving cases and the admissibil-ity of securing a claim before initiating proceedings) are regu-lated in a manner that satisfies the requirements of 2023, other issues (e.g. the rules of holding remote hearings or the conse-quences of failing to meet deadlines in arbitration, in particular the deadlines for issuing an award) would require a number of modifications and improvements. This suggests that a pos-tulate should be presented for a broader discussion within the community – both in Poland and abroad – on the shape of the regulations in this area that would be the most comforta-ble for the parties to the proceedings, the arbitral tribunals and the arbitral institutions, while respecting the basic (universal) arbitration rules.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
commercial arbitration
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
arbitration proceedings’ principles
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
arbitration proceedings’ principles
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Collections
Views
16Acquisition Date8.04.2025
Downloads
9Acquisition Date8.04.2025
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
