Are you confident enough to act? Individual differences in action control are associated with post-decisional metacognitive bias

StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Zajkowski, Wojciech
Bielecki, Maksymilian
Marszał-Wiśniewska, Magdalena
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2022-06-01
Publisher
Journal title
PLoS ONE
Issue
6
Volume
17
Pages
Pages
1-30
ISSN
1932-6203
ISSN of series
Access date
2022-06-01
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
The art of making good choices and being consistent in executing them is essential for having a successful and fulfilling life. Individual differences in action control are believed to have a crucial impact on how we make choices and whether we put them in action. Action-oriented people are more decisive, flexible and likely to implement their intentions in the face of adversity. In contrast, state-oriented people often struggle to commit to their choices and end up second-guessing themselves. Here, we employ a model-based computational approach to study the underlying cognitive differences between action and state-oriented people in simple binary-choice decision tasks. In Experiment 1 we show that there is little-to-no evidence that the two groups differ in terms of decision-related parameters and strong evidence for differences in metacognitive bias. Action-oriented people exhibit greater confidence in the correctness of their choices as well as slightly elevated judgement sensitivity, although no differences in performance are present. In Experiment 2 we replicate this effect and show that the confidence gap generalizes to value-based decisions, widens as a function of difficulty and is independent of deliberation interval. Furthermore, allowing more time for confidence deliberation indicated that state-oriented people focus more strongly on external features of choice. We propose that a positive confidence bias, coupled with appropriate metacognitive sensitivity, might be crucial for the successful realization of intentions in many real-life situations. More generally, our study provides an example of how modelling latent cognitive processes can bring meaningful insight into the study of individual differences.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
cc-by
Except as otherwise noted, this item is licensed under the Attribution licence | Permitted use of copyrighted works
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Views
Views12
Acquisition Date3.04.2025
Downloads
Downloads30
Acquisition Date3.04.2025
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Google Scholar