„Dopieszczeni przez pana”. Czy istnieje alternatywa dla „zwrotu ludowego”?

StatusVoR
Simple item page
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-04-04T03:10:14Z
dc.abstract.enThe essay’s author addresses the arguments of critics of the so-called “people’sturn” in historiography, who in their description of relations in rural serfdom inPolish lands emphasise above all their complementary nature and alleged harmony,while also recognising the patriarchal and hierarchical order as the natural state ofthings, in which there was no need for the peasant to rebel. He shows that identicalarguments were put forward by conservative columnists defending the serfdomsystem in the 19thcentury. They wrote, for example, about the patrimonialconvention in the relations between heir and peasant, they belittled the scale ofviolence, and they emphasised the alleged timelessness of the peasant’s existence,“rooted in nature”. In addition he points to the selective approach taken by theauthors of two reviewed works in regard to sources, along with their omission ofkey publications in international literature on the subject.
dc.affiliationInstytut Nauk Społecznych
dc.contributor.authorLeszczyński, Adam
dc.date.access2024-06-14
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-03T10:49:48Z
dc.date.available2024-09-03T10:49:48Z
dc.date.created2024
dc.date.issued2024-06-14
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>The essay’s author addresses the arguments of critics of the so-called “people’s turn” in historiography, who in their description of relations in rural serfdom in Polish lands emphasise above all their complementary nature and alleged harmony, while also recognising the patriarchal and hierarchical order as the natural state of things, in which there was no need for the peasant to rebel. He shows that identical arguments were put forward by conservative columnists defending the serfdom system in the 19th century. They wrote, for example, about the patrimonial convention in the relations between heir and peasant, they belittled the scale of violence, and they emphasised the alleged timelessness of the peasant’s existence, “rooted in nature”. In addition he points to the selective approach taken by the authors of two reviewed works in regard to sources, along with their omission of key publications in international literature on the subject.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.physical163-174
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume68
dc.identifier.doi10.35757/KiS.2024.68.2.7
dc.identifier.eissn2300-195X
dc.identifier.issn0023-5172
dc.identifier.urihttps://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/851
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://czasopisma.isppan.waw.pl/kis/article/view/2585
dc.languagepl
dc.language.abstracten
dc.language.otheren
dc.pbn.affiliationnauki socjologiczne
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-SA
dc.rights.questionYes_rights
dc.share.articleOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.enpeople’s turn
dc.subject.enserfdom
dc.subject.enpeasants
dc.subject.enmethodology of historiography
dc.subject.plzwrot ludowy
dc.subject.plpańszczyzna
dc.subject.plchłopi
dc.subject.plmetodologia historiografii
dc.swps.sciencecloudsend
dc.title„Dopieszczeni przez pana”. Czy istnieje alternatywa dla „zwrotu ludowego”?
dc.title.alternative“Pampered by the lord”. Is there an alternative to “the people’s turn”?
dc.title.journalKultura i Społeczeństwo
dc.typeReviewArticle
dspace.entity.typeArticle