Implementers’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators in the implementation setting is associated with physical activity changes among participants of a planning intervention

StatusPost-Print
Dublin Core metadata
Alternative title
Authors
Łobczowska, Karolina
Kuliś-Stefańczyk, Ewa
Banik, Anna
Siwa, Maria
Boberska, Monika
Szczuka, Zofia
Zaleśkiewicz, Hanna
Wietrzykowska, Dominika
Krzywicka, Paulina
Misiakowska, Jowita
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2026-06-23
Publisher
Journal title
Psychology and Health
Issue
7
Volume
41
Pages
Pages
919–937
DOI
ISSN
0887-0446
ISSN of series
Weblink
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08870446.2025.2496239
Access date
2027-06-23
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
Objective The present study applies the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to investigate the associations between: (1) implementation process indicators, namely implementers’ perceptions of barriers/facilitators in the outer and inner implementation setting, (2) implementer self-efficacy and (3) changes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) among participants of two intervention studies (physical activity planning interventions versus control [education] conditions). Methods and measures Data collected among 372 participants (66.9% women; 9–86 years old) were matched with implementers’ data (n = 21, 100% women, 25–46 years old). MVPA was assessed with accelerometers at the baseline and 14-month follow-up. Implementation process indicators were self-reported by implementers. Results We found significant interaction effects of Time x Implementation Process indicators on MVPA. Participants who were supported by implementers who perceived barriers/facilitators in the inner and outer implementation setting as adequately addressed, maintained their MVPA at 14-month follow-up. A decline in MVPA was found among participants supported by implementers perceiving lower adequacy of addressing respective barriers/facilitators. Implementer self-efficacy was unrelated to MVPA of participants of intervention studies. Conclusions Implementers’ positive evaluation of the ways barriers/facilitators were addressed in the implementation setting may protect participants (regardless of their intervention or control group assignment) from a decline in MVPA time.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
Physical activity
implementation
planning
efficacy
intervention
Keywords other
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG 3. Good Health and Well-being
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
URI
https://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/2442
Type
License type
cc-by-nc
Except as otherwise noted, this item is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial licence | Permitted use of copyrighted works
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Aktywność fizyczna i jakość życia: badania diadyczne w kontekście formułowania planów indywidualnych, diadycznych i kolaboracyjnych
Jak wyjaśnić zachowania siedzące: zrewidowany refleksyjno-impulsywny model HAPA
Grant number
2014/15/B/HS6/00923
2017/27/B/HS6/00092
Files
pdf
Implementers’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators (AAM).pdf(404.68 KB)
Download
Views
Views0
Acquisition Date20.10.2022
Downloads
Downloads0
Acquisition Date20.10.2022
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Google Scholar