Does Peer Review Need to Change? A Panel on Reporting Standards and Checklists in the Age of AI

StatusVoR
Simple item page
dc.abstract.enMany scientific fields of study use formally established reportingstandards to foster research and experimental design, transparency,replicability, peer review, and student training. Examples includeCONSORT in medicine, the What Works Clearinghouse in educa-tion, JARS in psychology. Such standards yield agreement on studyreporting and evaluation, even if using different methodologies.CHI has not adopted reporting standards. Like other fields, CHI hasseen an increased number of low-quality submissions and reviewsfueled by AI. This panel’s objective is to discuss advantages and bar-riers of adopting reporting standards for SIGCHI. Panelists includerepresentatives with significant experience creating, adopting andoperationalizing reporting standards in adjacent fields: softwareengineering, CS education, and Programming Languages. The panelwill include an overview of the history of reporting standards, a livedemo of a standards-based peer review system, discussions of op-portunities, challenges, limitations for SIGCHI reporting standards,and an interactive discussion between attendees and panelists
dc.affiliationWydział Psychologii w Warszawie
dc.affiliationInstytut Psychologii
dc.conference2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
dc.conference.countryHiszpania
dc.conference.datefinish2026-04-17
dc.conference.datestart2026-04-13
dc.conference.placeBarcelona
dc.conference.seriesInternational Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
dc.conference.seriesshortcutCHI
dc.conference.seriesweblinkhttps://dl.acm.org/conference/CHI
dc.conference.shortcutCHI'26
dc.conference.weblinkhttps://chi2026.acm.org/
dc.contributor.authorDuchowski, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorStefik, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorRalph, Paul
dc.contributor.authorDix, Alan
dc.contributor.authorKrejtz, Krzysztof
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Brad A.
dc.contributor.authorJorge, Joaquim
dc.contributor.authorWehbe, Rina R.
dc.contributor.editorOliver, Nuria
dc.contributor.editorShamma, David A.
dc.contributor.editorCandello, Heloisa
dc.contributor.editorCesar, Pablo
dc.contributor.editorLopes, Pedro
dc.contributor.editorArtizzu, Valentino
dc.contributor.editorDraxler, Fiona
dc.contributor.editorLopez, Gustavo
dc.contributor.editorReinschluessel, Anke V.
dc.contributor.editorTong, Xin
dc.contributor.editorToup Dugas, Phoebe O,
dc.date.access2026-04-13
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-18T11:46:49Z
dc.date.available2026-06-18T11:46:49Z
dc.date.created2026-05
dc.date.issued2026-04-13
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.physical1-5
dc.description.sdgDecentWorkAndEconomicGrowth
dc.description.sdgGenderEquality
dc.description.sdgQualityEducation
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3772363.3790074
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-4007-2281-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/2432
dc.languageen
dc.pbn.affiliationpsychologia
dc.publisher.ministerialAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)
dc.relation.bookCHI EA '26: Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
dc.relation.languageen
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.rights.questionYes_rights
dc.share.monoPUBLISHER_WEBSITE
dc.subject.enevidence standards
dc.subject.enreporting templates
dc.subject.enreview checklists
dc.swps.sciencecloudsend
dc.titleDoes Peer Review Need to Change? A Panel on Reporting Standards and Checklists in the Age of AI
dc.title.journalProceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
dc.typeMonographyChapterConference
dspace.entity.typeBook