Structural Coherence before Interpretative Flexibility: Roman Law and Legislative Responsibility in the Age of AI

StatusVoR
Simple item page
dc.abstract.enRoman law achieved legal certainty not through legislative accumulation but through structural coherence. The concepts of obligatio and bona fides ensured stability by allowing interpretative flexibility to operate within an intelligible normative framework. Contemporary legal systems, however, function under conditions of legislative inflation, vertical multilayering, and algorithmic mediation of legal information, all of which contribute to normative fragmentation. This article examines whether legislative responsibility in the age of artificial intelligence requires preserving structural coherence before interpretative flexibility. Semantic reconstruction of dispersed normative relations may strengthen legal certainty by improving the intelligibility of legal obligations; it also, however, creates risks associated with formalisation bias, technological asymmetry, and excessive reliance on computational outputs. Refraining from systematic reconstruction entails equally serious risks: fragmented regulatory structures reduce the practical accessibility of law, while interpretative authority may gradually shift towards private technological infrastructures. The article argues that structural coherence is not merely a technical requirement but a precondition for legal certainty and for maintaining the rule of law in AI-mediated legal systems.
dc.affiliationInstytut Prawa
dc.conference16th Polish-Spanish Conference on the European Legal Tradition: The Evolution of Roman Law as an Inspiration for the Modern Legislator in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: New Perspectives in Contract Formation
dc.conference.countryPolska
dc.conference.coverageinternational
dc.conference.datefinish2026-05-08
dc.conference.datestart2026-05-08
dc.conference.placeWarszawa
dc.conference.seriesPolish-Spanish Conference on the European Legal Tradition
dc.conference.seriesshortcutPolish-Spanish Conference on the European Legal Tradition
dc.conference.seriesweblinkhttps://sites.google.com/view/polspa-conference?pli=1&authuser=0
dc.conference.shortcut16th Polish-Spanish Conference on the European Legal Tradition
dc.conference.weblinkhttps://sites.google.com/view/polspa-conference?pli=1&authuser=0
dc.contributor.authorWojtkiewicz, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.editorKursa, Sławomir
dc.contributor.editorSkwirowska, Justyna
dc.contributor.editorMontañana, Amparo
dc.contributor.editorTafaro, Laura
dc.date.access2026-11-05
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T12:03:37Z
dc.date.available2026-11-05T12:03:37Z
dc.date.created2026-10
dc.date.issued2026-10
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.physical139–155
dc.description.sdgPeaceJusticeAndStrongInstitutions
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume2
dc.identifier.isbn9788384470923
dc.identifier.urihttps://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/2734
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://sklep.marszalek.com.pl/pl/glowna/6163-the-evolution-of-roman-law-as-an-inspiration-for-the-modern-legislator-vol-2.html
dc.languageen
dc.pbn.affiliationnauki prawne
dc.publisher.ministerialWydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
dc.relation.bookThe Evolution of Roman Law as an Inspiration for the Modern Legislator in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: New Perspectives in Contract Formation. Vol 2
dc.relation.languageen
dc.relation.pages518
dc.rightsClosedAccess
dc.rights.explanationzamknięty dostęp
dc.rights.questionNo_rights
dc.share.monoOTHER
dc.subject.enRoman law
dc.subject.enlegislative responsibility
dc.subject.enlegal certainty
dc.subject.enartificial intelli- gence
dc.subject.ennormative reconstruction
dc.subject.eninterpretative flexibility
dc.subject.enrule of law
dc.swps.sciencecloudsend
dc.titleStructural Coherence before Interpretative Flexibility: Roman Law and Legislative Responsibility in the Age of AI
dc.typeMonographyChapterConference
dspace.entity.typeBook