Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across cultures, especially in high individual autonomy societies
Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across cultures, especially in high individual autonomy societies
StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Andersson, Per A
Vartanova, Irina
Vastfjall, Daniel
Tinghog, Gustav
Strimling, Pontus
Wu, Junhui
Hazin, Isabela
Akotia, Charity S.
Aldashev, Alisher
Andrighetto, Giulia
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2024-03-07
Publisher
Journal title
Scientific Reports
Issue
Volume
14
Pages
Pages
1-12
DOI
ISSN
2045-2322
ISSN of series
Access date
2024-03-07
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
When someone violates a social norm, others may think that some sanction would be appropriate. We examine how the experience of emotions like anger and disgust relate to the judged appropriateness of sanctions, in a pre-registered analysis of data from a large-scale study in 56 societies. Across the world, we find that individuals who experience anger and disgust over a norm violation are more likely to endorse confrontation, ostracism and, to a smaller extent, gossip. Moreover, we find that the experience of anger is consistently the strongest predictor of judgments of confrontation, compared to other emotions. Although the link between state-based emotions and judgments may seem universal, its strength varies across countries. Aligned with theoretical predictions, this link is stronger in societies, and among individuals, that place higher value on individual autonomy. Thus, autonomy values may increase the role that emotions play in guiding judgments of social sanctions.