Semantic versus perceptual priming: dissecting their impact on intuitive judgments of semantic coherence

StatusVoR
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-12-14T04:11:06Z
dc.abstract.enThis research explores the mechanisms underlying the intuitive processing of semantic coherence, focusing on the effects of semantic and perceptual priming on semantic coherence detection. Two studies examined how these priming types influence individuals’ abilities to discern semantic incoherence. In Study 1, we used solutions to semantically coherent triads as primes, finding that such priming significantly improves participants’ accuracy and confidence in identifying incoherent elements within word tetrads. These results corroborate the hypothesis that intuitive judgments in linguistic tasks are closely tied to the processing fluency elicited by semantic connections. In Study 2, we show that perceptual priming does not significantly enhance accuracy, albeit it does increase the confidence with which individuals make their judgments. Distinct effects of semantic and perceptual priming on intuitive judgments highlight the complex interplay between processing fluency and affect in shaping intuitive judgments of semantic coherence. We discuss the nuanced roles of semantic and perceptual factors in influencing the accuracy and confidence of intuitive decisions.
dc.affiliationWydział Pychologii w Warszawie
dc.affiliationWydział Psychologii w Warszawie
dc.contributor.authorSweklej, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorBalas, Robert
dc.date.access2024-06-25
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-07T07:48:20Z
dc.date.available2025-11-07T07:48:20Z
dc.date.created2024-06-10
dc.date.issued2024-06-25
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>This research explores the mechanisms underlying the intuitive processing of semantic coherence, focusing on the effects of semantic and perceptual priming on semantic coherence detection. Two studies examined how these priming types influence individuals’ abilities to discern semantic incoherence. In Study 1, we used solutions to semantically coherent triads as primes, finding that such priming significantly improves participants’ accuracy and confidence in identifying incoherent elements within word tetrads. These results corroborate the hypothesis that intuitive judgments in linguistic tasks are closely tied to the processing fluency elicited by semantic connections. In Study 2, we show that perceptual priming does not significantly enhance accuracy, albeit it does increase the confidence with which individuals make their judgments. Distinct effects of semantic and perceptual priming on intuitive judgments highlight the complex interplay between processing fluency and affect in shaping intuitive judgments of semantic coherence. We discuss the nuanced roles of semantic and perceptual factors in influencing the accuracy and confidence of intuitive decisions.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.grantnumber2017/25/B/HS6/00551
dc.description.granttitleJak działa intuicja. Udział procesów poznawczych i afektywnych w intuicyjnych sądach na temat spójności semantycznej.
dc.description.physical1-11
dc.description.sdgNoSDGsAreRelevantForThisPublication
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume15
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1406811
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/1965
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1406811/full
dc.languageen
dc.pbn.affiliationpsychologia
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.rights.questionYes_rights
dc.share.articleOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.enintuition
dc.subject.enjudgments of semantic coherence
dc.subject.ensemantic priming
dc.subject.enperceptual priming
dc.subject.enconfidence
dc.swps.sciencecloudsend
dc.titleSemantic versus perceptual priming: dissecting their impact on intuitive judgments of semantic coherence
dc.title.journalFrontiers in Psychology
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typeArticle