Moral dilemmas and psychopathic personality traits

StatusVoR
Dublin Core metadata
Alternative title
Authors
Ząbek, Marlena
Machan, Laura
Boduszek, Daniel
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2025-11-18
Publisher
Journal title
Journal of Criminal Psychology
Issue
6
Volume
15
Pages
Pages
770-783
DOI
ISSN
2009-3829
ISSN of series
Weblink
Access date
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
Purpose Moral psychology often assumes a relationship between psychopathy and moral judgments. The purpose of this study is to focus on these issues and examine how psychopathic traits are related to moral decision-making. Hypotheses were formulated, assuming that individuals more sensitive to consequences do not significantly differ from those less sensitive in affective responsiveness, cognitive responsiveness, interpersonal manipulation and egocentricity. It was predicted that individuals less sensitive to moral norms would exhibit greater deficits in affective and cognitive responsiveness, as well as higher levels of interpersonal manipulation and egocentricity. It was also assumed that individuals who prefer action would demonstrate higher levels of these traits. To verify the hypotheses, the methodology used addresses the limitations of previous research methods. Design/methodology/approach The psychopathic personality traits model (PPTM) (Boduszek et al., 2018) was utilized to measure the four aspects of psychopathy as outlined by Boduszek et al. (2018): affective responsiveness, cognitive responsiveness, interpersonal manipulation and egocentricity. The consequences, norms and inaction (CNI) model (Gawronski et al., 2017) was used to quantify sensitivity to consequences, sensitivity to moral norms and general preference for inaction versus action in response to moral dilemmas. The study was conducted on a general population sample (n = 523). Findings It was found that individuals with greater deficits in affective responsiveness are more sensitive to consequences, less sensitive to moral norms and more likely to prefer inaction. Moreover, individuals with pronounced egocentricity showed less sensitivity to the consequences of their moral decisions. Originality/value The results of the study indicate that the relationship between psychopathic personality traits and moral judgments is varied. Deficits in affective responsiveness are associated with a tendency to make decisions that are sensitive to the greater good. Conversely, they are linked to a propensity to violate moral norms and to prefer inaction. Individuals with pronounced egocentricity primarily focus on their own attitudes, interests and beliefs, neglecting overall well-being. The study highlights the complexity of psychopathic traits, demonstrating that deficits in affective responsiveness can be both beneficial and potentially risky, which is particularly relevant in organizational psychology. Understanding these ambiguous manifestations reveals that, although individuals with such traits may make rational and effective decisions, their choices can raise moral concerns. In clinical and forensic psychology, this knowledge can enhance intervention strategies, ensuring a more targeted approach. Moreover, it may improve risk assessment models for recidivism, leading to more accurate predictions of future norm violations.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
Deontology
Moral dilemmas
Personality traits
Psychopathy
Utilitarianism
Keywords other
Sustainable Development Goals
No SDGs are relevant for this Publication
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
URI
https://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/2645
Type
License type
closedaccess
There is no access to this item
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Grant number
Views
Views0
Acquisition Date20.10.2022
Downloads
Downloads0
Acquisition Date20.10.2022
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Google Scholar