Examining the impact of control condition design in mimicry–liking link research : how motor behavior may impact liking
Examining the impact of control condition design in mimicry–liking link research : how motor behavior may impact liking
StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Trzmielewska, Weronika
Duras, Jakub
Juchacz, Aleksandra
Rak, Tomasz
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2024
Publisher
Journal title
Roczniki Psychologiczne
Issue
4
Volume
27
Pages
Pages
351–378
ISSN
2451-4306
1507-7888
1507-7888
ISSN of series
Weblink
Access date
2025-06-20
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
Mimicry is an automatic imitation of an interacting partner’s behaviors. The most frequently researched consequence of being mimicked is liking. Yet there is little research on whether specific
design of control conditions (i.e., variable behavior of the confederate across conditions) may affect study results. In this study, we compared the classical mimicry group with four control conditions: (i–ii) a confederate sits still or makes random movements (common in mimicry research), (iii) confederates receive no instructions regarding their nonverbal behavior (rarely observed in mimicry studies), and a condition that we created, in which (iv) a confederate makes atypical motor movements. Participants (N = 538) were interviewed by confederates, while the confederates’ behavior varied across conditions during the interviews. They mimicked the participants’ nonverbal behaviors (mimicry condition), sat still (no-movement condition), made random nonverbal movements unrelated to the participants (responsiveness condition), made repetitive body and object movements (repetitive behavior condition), or participated in the interview without any further instructions (double-blind condition). The confederate’s behavior influenced liking: χ2 (4) = 40.7, p < 0.001, ε2 = 0.07. Participants liked the confederates more when the latter mimicked them than when they sat still (p < 0.001) or made repetitive movements (p = 0.008), but not when the confederates made random movements, and when they only engaged in the conversation (p > 0.5). There were also differences between the no-movements condition (i) and the responsiveness condition (p = 0.003), (ii) and the double-blind condition (p < 0.001). Because the two classical control con-ditions are treated interchangeably in mimicry studies, more attention should be paid to the methodological aspects of mimicry research. Additionally, a mini-metaanalysis was conducted.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
mimicry
interpersonal liking
experimental conditions
methodology
systematic review
metaanalysis
interpersonal liking
experimental conditions
methodology
systematic review
metaanalysis
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Collections
Views
9Acquisition Date11.08.2025
Downloads
6Acquisition Date11.08.2025
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
