The Testimony or the Eyewitness? Factors That Influence Eyewitness Credibility Assessment Conducted by (Future) Fact-Finders and Laypeople

StatusPost-Print
Alternative title
Authors
Kabzińska, Joanna
Dukała, Karolina
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2024-11-10
Publisher
Journal title
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
Issue
Volume
Pages
Pages
1-23
ISSN
2473-2850
ISSN of series
Access date
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
Purpose: This study examined how the (in)consistency of eyewitness testimony and their relationship with the defendant affect assessments of eyewitness credibility and defendant culpability, along with decision confidence. Methods: Judicial apprentices (N = 125) and students (N = 115) rated the guilt and credibility of testimony after reading a case summary. Results: Eyewitness-defendant relationships influenced credibility judgements but not guilt assessments. Reminiscent details reduced credibility ratings and increased culpability judgements. Future judges exhibited greater confidence than laypeople. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the need for ecologically valid research involving legal professionals to better understand evidence credibility and verdict decision-making.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
(in)consistency of eyewitness testimony
eyewitness credibility
legal credibility assessment
credibility judgment
judicial decision-making
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
closedaccess
There is no access to this item
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Rola psychologii w procesie podejmowania decyzji przez zawodowych uczestników postępowania karnego
Views
Views10
Acquisition Date4.04.2025
Downloads
Downloads3
Acquisition Date4.04.2025
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Google Scholar