Taking stock of Syria's Approach to Transitional Justice

StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Nabożna, Karolina
Bachmann, Klaus
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2026-01-20
Publisher
Journal title
International Criminal Law Review
Issue
Volume
Pages
Pages
DOI
ISSN
1567-536X
ISSN of series
Access date
2026-02-19
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
In December 2024, in a sweeping military campaign, the HTS overran several government strongholds in Syria and took Damascus, installing a transitional government and creating new institutions. According to Huntington’s model, this was a replacement transition which did not require the new rulers to negotiate a transitional agreement with the incumbent government. In this article, we argue that the HTS leadership nevertheless cannot freely choose among the available options of transitional justice, but instead is constrained by external and domestic factors, which are already about to push the new government into the direction of restorative and symbolic transitional justice measures. In view of Syria’s dire economic conditions, redistributive victim-centered justice is just as unlikely as harsh and broad punishment for perpetrators of past human rights abuses. The latter would be severely hampered by the new rulers’ rule-of-law commitments and the weakness of the post-al-Asad judiciary.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
Syria
Transitional Justice
double transition
HTS
restorative and symbolic justice
Keywords other
Sustainable Development Goals
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
closedaccess
There is no access to this item
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Views
Views0
Acquisition Date20.10.2022
Downloads
Downloads0
Acquisition Date20.10.2022
Google Scholar
Google Scholar