Hope and distress: a cross‐country study amid the russian‐ukrainian war
Hope and distress: a cross‐country study amid the russian‐ukrainian war
StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Esbit, Simon
Kaim, Arielle
Kimhi, Shaul
Bankauskaite, Dalia
Baran, Maria
Baran, Tomasz
Cosciug, Anatolie
Eshel, Yohannan
Dumbadze, Salome
Gabashvili, Manana
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2025-04-12
Publisher
Journal title
Stress and Health
Issue
2
Volume
41
Pages
Pages
1-14
ISSN
1532-3005
ISSN of series
Access date
2025-04-12
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
Conflict deeply affects human experiences, frequently testing individual resilience to its breaking point and leaving enduring psychological and societal wounds. The current conflict in Ukraine, initiated by Russia's invasion in 2022, illustrates this phenomenon by altering regional relationships and triggering a major humanitarian crisis marked by extensive displacement, loss of life, and emotional turmoil. This study explores the factors influencing hope and distress in Ukraine alongside six nearby European countries during the ongoing conflict. A cross‐sectional survey collected data primarily via internet panel samples from the Czech Republic, Georgia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Ukraine in the second year since the war's initiation. The current study utilised validated instruments, collecting data on levels of hope, distress, individual resilience, community resilience, societal resilience, morale, sense of danger, perceived security threats, and demographic characteristics. Hope and distress levels differ across countries, with Ukraine exhibiting the highest levels of both (3.74 ± 1.02 and 2.89 ± 0.87, respectively). Overall, average scores of hope were higher than average distress levels. Across the regression models for the seven countries, hope showed strong associations with individual (between β = 0.089 and β = 0.327) and societal resilience (between β = 0.206 and β = 0.514), while morale (between β = −0.104 and β = −0.479) and individual resilience (between β = −0.077 and β = −0.335) displayed a protective relationship against distress (all β values were significant, p < 0.01). Monitoring hope and distress is crucial during the Russian‐Ukrainian war and other adversities, as these factors give insight into the current and future psychological states of affected populations. The results offer valuable information that can guide the development of tailored strategies to enhance hope and buffer distress in war‐impacted countries, as well as those experiencing its broader effects. Fostering individual and societal resilience, alongside enhancing morale, may strengthen hope and mitigate distress amid adversity. Developing targeted interventions that address each population's unique needs, as well as their sociocultural and geopolitical contexts can enhance efficacy.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Collections
Views
8Acquisition Date24.04.2025
Downloads
1Acquisition Date24.04.2025
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
