Becoming a teacher can reduce obedience compared to being solely an examiner. Agentic state and obedience in the Milgram paradigm
Becoming a teacher can reduce obedience compared to being solely an examiner. Agentic state and obedience in the Milgram paradigm
StatusVoR
Alternative title
Authors
Grzyb, Tomasz
Doliński, Dariusz
Monograph
Monograph (alternative title)
Date
2025-10-15
Publisher
Journal title
Frontiers in Psychology
Issue
Volume
16
Pages
Pages
1-10
ISSN
1664-1078
ISSN of series
Access date
2025-10-15
Abstract PL
Abstract EN
Studies of obedience carried out in the Milgram paradigm tend to report shockingly high levels of obedience from people who are ordered by an authority figure to eventually, if administer all required shocks, electrocute another person. In the psychology literature, the person who carries out these commands is called the teacher. The authors of the present article note, however, that the term “examiner” would be more appropriate here, since the study participant is limited to verifying the correctness of the responses given by the student, i.e., the person sitting behind the wall. It was assumed that if the participant actually performed the role of a teacher (and thus first taught the “student,” and only then checked the correctness of the answers to questions), the level of obedience demonstrated would be reduced. The results of our experiment partially confirmed this assumption. In the examiner condition, 4 out of 40 participants (10%) refused to press all ten switches, meaning that 90% proceeded to 150 V. In the conditions where participants had first taught the student, refusals occurred more than twice as often: 9 out of 40 (22.5%), with 77.5% reaching 150 V. This difference, however, was not statistically significant. We also analyzed an indirect measure of non-compliance—the frequency with which the experimenter had to prompt participants to continue by reciting the standardized phrases prescribed by the procedure whenever participants expressed hesitation or refused to comply. These experimenter interventions were more frequent in the conditions where participants had previously taught the learner (Median = 0.5) than in the examiner condition, where their role was limited to punishing learner for his mistakes (Median = 0). This difference was statistically significant.
Abstract other
Keywords PL
Keywords EN
obedience
Milgram paradigm
teaching vs. examining
social influence
compliance
Milgram paradigm
teaching vs. examining
social influence
compliance
Keywords other
Exhibition title
Place of exhibition (institution)
Exhibition curator
Type
License type
Funder
Time range from
Time range to
Contact person name
Related publication
Related publication
Grant/project name
Collections
Views
10Acquisition Date16.12.2025
Downloads
2Acquisition Date16.12.2025
Altmetrics©
Dimensions
Google Scholar
