The costs of ideological prosociality: Analyses of the European Social Survey from 2002 to 2018 find negative relationships between endorsing universalistic values and well-being and social capital

StatusVoR
Simple item page
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-04-10T03:11:50Z
dc.abstract.enTraditionally, prosociality has been conceptualized in terms of the interpersonal domain, for example, helping behavior. Nevertheless, people can be prosocial in terms of ideological domains, for example, social policies they support. The present study examined the utility of distinguishing interpersonal and ideological prosocial values as predictors of well-being and social capital. Data from nine European Social Surveys were combined. The Universalism and Benevolence values of Schwartz's basic human values were treated as measures of ideological and interpersonal prosocial values. Relationships between Universalism and Benevolence and well-being and social capital were examined with multilevel models, persons nested with rounds, rounds nested within countries. Respondent sex, age, and education were included as covariates. These analyses found that Benevolence was positively related to satisfaction with life and happiness, whereas Universalism was negatively related to satisfaction with life and happiness. Although endorsing both values was positively related to attitudinal measures of social capital (e.g., people can be trusted), Universalism was negatively related to self-reports of social activity, whereas Benevolence was either positively related or unrelated to self-reports of social activity. Being ideologically prosocial appears to be associated with reduced well-being. Future research is needed to explain the mechanisms responsible for this relationship.
dc.affiliationInstitute of Psychology
dc.affiliationInstytut Psychologii
dc.contributor.authorNezlek, John
dc.date.access2022-07-20
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-05T14:25:29Z
dc.date.available2024-01-05T14:25:29Z
dc.date.created2022-06-22
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.description.abstract<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Traditionally, prosociality has been conceptualized in terms of the interpersonal domain, for example, helping behavior. Nevertheless, people can be prosocial in terms of ideological domains, for example, social policies they support. The present study examined the utility of distinguishing interpersonal and ideological prosocial values as predictors of well‐being and social capital. Data from nine European Social Surveys were combined. The<jats:italic>Universalism</jats:italic>and<jats:italic>Benevolence</jats:italic>values of Schwartz's basic human values were treated as measures of ideological and interpersonal prosocial values. Relationships between<jats:italic>Universalism</jats:italic>and<jats:italic>Benevolence</jats:italic>and well‐being and social capital were examined with multilevel models, persons nested with rounds, rounds nested within countries. Respondent sex, age, and education were included as covariates. These analyses found that<jats:italic>Benevolence</jats:italic>was positively related to satisfaction with life and happiness, whereas<jats:italic>Universalism</jats:italic>was negatively related to satisfaction with life and happiness. Although endorsing both values was positively related to attitudinal measures of social capital (e.g., people can be trusted),<jats:italic>Universalism</jats:italic>was negatively related to self‐reports of social activity, whereas<jats:italic>Benevolence</jats:italic>was either positively related or unrelated to self‐reports of social activity. Being ideologically prosocial appears to be associated with reduced well‐being. Future research is needed to explain the mechanisms responsible for this relationship.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimebefore_publication
dc.description.grantnumber2018/31/B/HS6/02822
dc.description.granttitleUnderstanding relationships between vegetarianism as a social identity and psychological well being
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.physical390-408
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume15
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aphw.12385
dc.identifier.issn1758-0846
dc.identifier.issn1758-0854
dc.identifier.urihttps://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/292
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://iaap-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/aphw.12385
dc.languageen
dc.pbn.affiliationpsychologia
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.rights.questionYes_rights
dc.share.articleOTHER
dc.subject.enEuropean Social Survey
dc.subject.enprosociality
dc.subject.ensocial capital
dc.subject.enwell-being
dc.swps.sciencecloudnosend
dc.titleThe costs of ideological prosociality: Analyses of the European Social Survey from 2002 to 2018 find negative relationships between endorsing universalistic values and well-being and social capital
dc.title.journalApplied Psychology: Health and Well-Being
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typeArticle