The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science

StatusVoR
Simple item page
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-08-30T03:13:57Z
dc.abstract.enIn psychological science, replicability—repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)—is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and far between in psychological science with many attempts failing to corroborate past findings. This scarcity, compounded by the difficulty in accessing replication data, jeopardizes the efficient allocation of research resources and impedes scientific advancement. Addressing this crucial gap, we present the Replication Database (https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer), a novel platform hosting 1,239 original findings paired with replication findings. The infrastructure of this database allows researchers to submit, access, and engage with replication findings. The database makes replications visible, easily findable via a graphical user interface, and tracks replication rates across various factors, such as publication year or journal. This will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the robustness of psychological research.
dc.affiliationWydział Psychologii w Sopocie
dc.contributor.authorRöseler, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, Leonard
dc.contributor.authorDoetsch, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorKlett, Noah
dc.contributor.authorSeida, Christian
dc.contributor.authorSchütz, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorAczel, Balazs
dc.contributor.authorAdelina, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorAgostini, Valeria
dc.contributor.authorAlarie, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak-Aydemir, Nihan
dc.contributor.authorAldoh, Alaa
dc.contributor.authorAl-Hoorie, Ali H.
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Flavio
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Bradley J.
dc.contributor.authorBarth, Charlotte Lilian
dc.contributor.authorBeitner, Julia
dc.contributor.authorBrick, Cameron
dc.contributor.authorBrohmer, Hilmar
dc.contributor.authorChandrashekar, Subramanya Prasad
dc.contributor.authorChung, Kai Li
dc.contributor.authorCockcroft, Jamie P.
dc.contributor.authorCummins, Jamie
dc.contributor.authorDiveica, Veronica
dc.contributor.authorDumbalska, Tsvetomira
dc.contributor.authorEfendic, Emir
dc.contributor.authorElsherif, Mahmoud
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorFeldman, Gilad
dc.contributor.authorFillon, Adrien
dc.contributor.authorFörster, Nico
dc.contributor.authorFrese, Joris
dc.contributor.authorGenschow, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorGiannouli, Vaitsa
dc.contributor.authorGjoneska, Biljana
dc.contributor.authorGnambs, Timo
dc.contributor.authorGourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Christopher J.
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, Helena
dc.contributor.authorHaviva, Clove
dc.contributor.authorHerderich, Alina
dc.contributor.authorHilbert, Leon P.
dc.contributor.authorHolgado, Darías
dc.contributor.authorHussey, Ian
dc.contributor.authorIlchovska, Zlatomira G.
dc.contributor.authorKalandadze, Tamara
dc.contributor.authorKarhulahti, Veli-Matti
dc.contributor.authorKasseckert, Leon
dc.contributor.authorKlingelhöfer-Jens, Maren
dc.contributor.authorKoppold, Alina
dc.contributor.authorKorbmacher, Max
dc.contributor.authorKulke, Louisa
dc.contributor.authorKuper, Niclas
dc.contributor.authorLaPlume, Annalise
dc.contributor.authorLeech, Gavin
dc.contributor.authorLohkamp, Feline
dc.contributor.authorMantou Lou, Nigel
dc.contributor.authorLynott, Dermot
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorMeier, Maria
dc.contributor.authorMontefinese, Maria
dc.contributor.authorMoreau, David
dc.contributor.authorMrkva, Kellen
dc.contributor.authorNemcova, Monika
dc.contributor.authorOomen, Danna
dc.contributor.authorPackheiser, Julian
dc.contributor.authorPandey, Shubham
dc.contributor.authorPapenmeier, Frank
dc.contributor.authorParuzel-Czachura, Mariola
dc.contributor.authorPavlov, Yuri G.
dc.contributor.authorPavlović, Zoran
dc.contributor.authorPennington, Charlotte R.
dc.contributor.authorPittelkow, Merle-Marie
dc.contributor.authorPlomp, Willemijn
dc.contributor.authorPlonski, Paul E.
dc.contributor.authorPronizius, Ekaterina
dc.contributor.authorPua, Andrew Adrian
dc.contributor.authorPypno-Blajda, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.authorRausch, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorRebholz, Tobias R.
dc.contributor.authorRichert, Elena
dc.contributor.authorRöer, Jan Philipp
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Robert
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorSkvortsova, Aleksandrina
dc.contributor.authorSperl, Matthias F. J.
dc.contributor.authorTan, Alvin W. M.
dc.contributor.authorThürmer, J. Lukas
dc.contributor.authorTołopiło, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.authorVanpaemel, Wolf
dc.contributor.authorVaughn, Leigh Ann
dc.contributor.authorVerheyen, Steven
dc.contributor.authorWallrich, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorWolska, Julia K.
dc.contributor.authorZaneva, Mirela
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yikang
dc.date.access2024-09-11
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T07:51:00Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T07:51:00Z
dc.date.created2024-08-27
dc.date.issued2024-09-11
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>In psychological science, replicability—repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)—is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and far between in psychological science with many attempts failing to corroborate past findings. This scarcity, compounded by the difficulty in accessing replication data, jeopardizes the efficient allocation of research resources and impedes scientific advancement. Addressing this crucial gap, we present the Replication Database (https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer), a novel platform hosting 1,239 original findings paired with replication findings. The infrastructure of this database allows researchers to submit, access, and engage with replication findings. The database makes replications visible, easily findable via a graphical user interface, and tracks replication rates across various factors, such as publication year or journal. This will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the robustness of psychological research.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.physical1-23
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume12
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/jopd.101
dc.identifier.issn2050-9863
dc.identifier.urihttps://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/872
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://openpsychologydata.metajnl.com/articles/10.5334/jopd.101
dc.languageen
dc.pbn.affiliationpsychologia
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.rights.questionYes_rights
dc.share.articleOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.enreplication
dc.subject.enreplication crisis
dc.subject.endatabase
dc.subject.enopen science
dc.subject.encollaborative
dc.subject.encredibility revolution
dc.subject.enmeta science
dc.swps.sciencecloudsend
dc.titleThe Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science
dc.title.journalJournal of Open Psychology Data
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typeArticle